Journalism as guarantor,

[Shishirgano9]

The creation of journalistic information invites us to think of new formats, and to devote aesthetics, beauty as a necessity to touch and inform. Because there is much to fear that pure and rational information will no longer suffice, and that beautiful (sensitive) or co-produced (interactive) information will be the new norms of the metaverse, and go beyond the question of observed truth. These trends for journalism put into perspective the current debates on the creation of fake news , deepfake and other synthetic media towards a debate on the very conditions of survival of reality and truth.


If debating the post-truth era eminently poses the place of what list of us mobile number database function can it exercise when the very notion of fact is redrawn in what we call synthetic reality? Synthetic reality Synthetic reality appears when the informational overlay doubles the real world, when the digital twin and the real become equivalent for the individual due to a process of convergence of the physical and the digital, real processes and the virtues of virtual communities. With daily practice and the creation of taste for these synthetic media, from Instagram to video games, the very perception of a synthetic reality is naturalized, as evidenced by the purchases of virtual goods.


Synthetic reality modifies the truth regime and therefore the essence of journalism: how to translate facts that are not real in the classical sense. If we look at current trends in the fabrication of truth in conspiracy communities in particular, the very fact of relaying is a process of creating a reality by saturating social networks with an image, a video and other fabrication of proof. Deployed in the metaverse, the dominant regime of truth is that of the diffusion of mass circulation, in the most virulent forms, the fabrication of proof no longer meeting the criterion of truth but of artificial repetition.