CPU-Z Multithreaded Performance
I then used Cinebench 2024 to measure rendering speed. In this test, the performance difference was much smaller, with the ASUS Vivobook S 15 scoring 885 points.
For the next test, I used Geekbench ML, a cross-platform benchmark that evaluates the performance of AI workloads using real-world machine learning tasks. The ASUS Vivobook S 15 scored 2,285, which is 32% lower than the ASUS NUC 14 PRO+ mini PC.
Geekbench ML Score
To evaluate web browsing performance, I used the macedonia telegram data JetStream 2 test in Google Chrome . As you can see, the ASUS Vivobook S 15 performed very well. However, this doesn’t tell you how fast the web browser is on this laptop, although web page rendering may indeed be a bit slower than on the mini PC I compared it to.
Evaluating Web Browsing Performance with JetStream 2
While the ASUS Vivobook S 15 isn't designed for gaming, I tested its Qualcomm Adreno graphics chip using 3DMark's Time Spy benchmark . It scored just 1825.5 points, which is far below what Intel's Arc Graphics can deliver.
I also ran Cyberpunk 2077 on the Vivobook S 15, and the average frame rate reached 23.5 fps when running the game in Full HD with the graphics preset set to High. These results confirm that the ASUS Vivobook S 15 is not the best choice for gamers.