Denis Dovgopoly: Let's smoothly

[zakiyatasnim]

But, speaking about the average degree of freedom of movement of people, you come to the conclusion that over the last 100 years it has decreased significantly. I think that it will decrease even more and even more under the influence of information technology. Because people, namely their brains, are becoming the most valuable asset for any developed country today. And, naturally, states will try to somehow retain such people. I don't think that everything will come down to, so to speak, serfdom, but, in principle, I think that in the next 15-20 years, the freedom of movement of people across borders may be seriously threatened. Just like the fact that states will try to control the movement of what is today called intellectual property. And generally speaking, these are again some information products created by the brains of people in this territory. Today, we are fine with the fact that some people in Ukraine invented something, patented it in America, and an American company gets money from it. But, generally speaking, I think that states will strongly oppose this state luxembourg number data of affairs. And they would already be doing this, and they are generally held back not by any humanitarian considerations, but rather by the US Sixth Fleet. As long as there is the Sixth Fleet on the other side and there is a country that dominates everyone, and it benefits from this movement of intellectual property to itself, given that the mouths that eat can remain in Ukraine or India, this situation will continue. If the balance does change,then the situation may also change.

move on to medicine. We were at a conference on intellectual property and there we had a very interesting, not even a debate, but a speech. Tell me, patents, copyrights, what do you see in the future?

Alexander Olshansky: The conference on intellectual property had a completely fantastic sequel, which you were not present at. That is, we arrived in Kiev, and the Department of Intellectual Property was preparing a new bill, an anti-piracy one. We went to the department and tried to explain to them that it was complete nonsense. They generally agreed with this. We showed examples of what can and cannot be done. In general, a correct concept was roughly developed on how to control copyright on the Ukrainian Internet, etc. After which copyright holders came to the next meeting, one of whom almost verbatim said the following, that “since we do not earn any money from this Internet, it is better for us to close it down altogether.” After which the more or less clear concept of the bill was again rewritten in such a form that now all of us - providers, hosters, domain name registrars and generally everyone who mentions this terrible word “Internet” will bear joint and several liability for violating this copyright. Because this guy thinks he doesn't make any money from the Internet, so it's a completely unnecessary thing for him. Unfortunately,