And that's pretty damn powerful

A comprehensive repository of Taiwan's data and information.
Post Reply
rifat28dddd
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2024 12:05 pm

And that's pretty damn powerful

Post by rifat28dddd »

Just look at Google's Gmail, which had a beta tag attached to it even after more than 100 million users and 5+ years after its launch. Although it smells of a marketing ploy (co-founder Larry Page once admitted the beta label had more to do with “messaging and branding”), it made users feel like they had a voice in how the product was molded.


To-do list for this step:

Listen to feedback from customers/clients and implement nepal telegram data any ideas to improve the project.
Fix any lingering bugs or issues from the original deployment.
Gather the team to get their thoughts on how the project went and what could be improved for next time in terms of planning, implementation, and testing.
Key Advantages of Using the Waterfall Model
There's a reason the Waterfall model is still talked about for project management—it's a perfect fit for certain projects.

For projects with hard deadlines and deliverables, Waterfall is a good choice because:

The development process allows team leaders to build out a detailed project plan. The team working on the project will have a crystal clear idea about what the design, implementation, and launch will look like.
It keeps the project budget in check. As each phase of the project is planned in advance, it's easier to estimate the final cost for your client accurately.
Every milestone and deadline is scheduled at the start of the project, so everyone knows what they are expected to deliver (and when).
There isn't a ton of room for project scope creep. Clients can't add new requirements once the work kicks off, so there's less chance of delay or blowing up the project budget.
Disadvantages of the Waterfall Approach
It needs a huge time investment to sufficiently research, plan, and map out the project before any work can begin.
Any delays during each phase can have a huge impact on reaching project deadlines and milestones.
There is no looking back. Once planning or implementation is complete, your team must move on to the next phase. This rigid method doesn't have much flexibility to turn around and have a do-over.
Clients may change their minds about a final deliverable or outcome. However, Waterfall doesn't really allow for any major changes, so they will be harder to implement, or worse—you will have to tell the client no.
The client won't see the project until the testing phase. If they don't like it or they have feedback, it's too late to make any (significant) changes.
Post Reply