What would have changed if the case result had been different?

[sumaiyakhatun27]

In general, the position of the "mirror of the Russian Internet" was a bit surprising, to be honest. It reads a claim against us for publishing this material. But let's assume for a moment: wAfter all, Roman Morozov and I initially agreed: we would publish the results , no matter what they were.


In the eyes of Yandex, we would then obviously be like the Kibalchish boys: oh, south africa email list what good fellows, you showed that cheating is a senseless waste of time and money. Yes, we are not Kibalchish. But we are not bad guys either. We are just a platform that published this case. Having no benefit from publishing the material, we are trying - yes, damn it! - to reach out to Yandex: hey, guys, do you see this? Go ahead and fix it! This is what we want to tell Yandex.


The position of hushing up problems in ranking algorithms has not led this market to anything good. It is still just as hard to work there for those who are used to developing projects in a comprehensive manner and using "white" methods. Because over the years of the existence of holes, business has become accustomed to something else and it is very difficult to relearn. We still do not call for using "holes" in search engine algorithms.