Exchange on an equal footing is important for us." You've already noticed: Here again, the jargon of both worlds. " of state broadcasting as a moral educational institution, while Matter takes over the talk of customer orientation, which is the subject of the first five minutes of every marketing seminar. What both have in common is japan rcs data that they are only interested in one thing: the status quo, both institutionally and financially, market dominance, advertising revenue - all without any real competitors.
The planned close cooperation between the state broadcaster and a large private media company also points in this direction. What consequences will this have for editorial independence, when the mutual multiple management of stories, programs, celebrities, etc. already works excellently? Will Ringier really still be able to critically examine the SRG? Will the SRG really be willing to critically question a story from Ringier? And will both companies have to go easy on Swisscom's management in their reporting on their business departments? If the SRG journalists want to preserve their self-declared independence to some extent, this - and much more - should be possible. But I have my doubts. So far, the SRG has rarely been noticed for consistently putting journalistic independence ahead of the wishes of the advertising industry or its sponsors.