Proper reading and understanding of IDEF0 models
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:28 am
Requires some training and modest experience. A thorough understanding of the topic is necessary to ensure the quality of the IDEF modeling provided by the team. Anyone who has advanced sufficiently in proper reading is called a "reader." The IDEF team discipline defines all persons interested in reviewing a model as reviewers. Reviewers who are assigned to examine and write comments on a Set are called commenters. Reviewers who receive a Set for information only, not for written comments, are called readers. The author and commenters share responsibility for the quality of the model.
Once an agreed-upon result is accepted, the other armenia whatsapp number data reviewers share responsibility for the result. The work procedure requires that each person expected to comment on a diagram make comments in writing and submit them to the diagram author. After writing on the reader's copy, the author responds to each note in writing (a simple check mark, for approval; otherwise, a note in response). This cycle continues, covering all Sets related to a particular model, until the model is completed and recommended for publication. At regular intervals as the model evolves, a master copy of the latest version is placed in the library and a copy is distributed as a Set that is sent to readers to help them maintain current information about the model.
As the comments on each Set are reviewed by the author, the author revises the master copy of the model to incorporate the corrections and changes. Another Set that incorporates the latest changes is then distributed down the list to readers. More detailed information is added by creating more diagrams, text, and a glossary. More comments, more changes. The end result of this process for organized teamwork is a high level of confidence that the final IDEF models are effective, well expressed, and that consensus has been reached with the group of readers who were involved in the review cycle.
Once an agreed-upon result is accepted, the other armenia whatsapp number data reviewers share responsibility for the result. The work procedure requires that each person expected to comment on a diagram make comments in writing and submit them to the diagram author. After writing on the reader's copy, the author responds to each note in writing (a simple check mark, for approval; otherwise, a note in response). This cycle continues, covering all Sets related to a particular model, until the model is completed and recommended for publication. At regular intervals as the model evolves, a master copy of the latest version is placed in the library and a copy is distributed as a Set that is sent to readers to help them maintain current information about the model.
As the comments on each Set are reviewed by the author, the author revises the master copy of the model to incorporate the corrections and changes. Another Set that incorporates the latest changes is then distributed down the list to readers. More detailed information is added by creating more diagrams, text, and a glossary. More comments, more changes. The end result of this process for organized teamwork is a high level of confidence that the final IDEF models are effective, well expressed, and that consensus has been reached with the group of readers who were involved in the review cycle.