And on the other hand, it is engagement. On average, engagement in a narrative is much higher than in a text article, because a person interacts with screens and does not read the article, but looks through it and swipes with his finger. This is a completely different kind of engagement. In this sense, such a banner simply brings in more. Of course, I am not talking about any clicks now.
There is a powerful ORSE system that counts clicks and, of course, we do this too. belgium consumer email list So narratives are a specific story about engagement. About the content from the site What are the criteria for evaluating sites whose RSS feed will be included in Zen? We have absolutely universal criteria for content evaluation. Content evaluation for sites and channels is absolutely universal. In general, initially, historically, content got into Zen, as it gets into a search engine.
All content from the RuNet that is similar to media content gets into Zen, passes the algorithm check for how similar it is to media content, how much it complies with all the rules, and gets into the feeds. Why do we need RSS at all… The algorithm sometimes makes mistakes. It makes mistakes in how relevant the material is, in the presentation of the image, preview, it may not understand what is a snippet, and so on.
Do narrative views pay more than article views?
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 5:30 am