Complete nonsense. And the ultimate goal of such cases - it is unachievable in principle: okay, they will remove the article from one place, after 3 years of trials, but in 3 days everyone who needed to read it has already been read and distributed everywhere. Who needs your court decision three years after the noise? You? Are you sure? In addition, many sites and platforms work on the principle of dealers.
They gather a crowd of "addicts" and give the opportunity to publish france email list something on their site. For example, to run a blog or a column. And you, joyful, run to this podium. And you defend your truth, scold your opponents. And then opponents also come to these sites and scold you there. You get offended, try to present something to the site, the editorial staff.
And they are off the hook. The lawyers will send you a quote from the editorial policy of the publication, where all responsibility will not be on them, but on the one who wrote and posted the material. Go find him and try to sue him. Good luck! No, all of the above are weak moves and paths that will eat you up from the inside.
Slander, damage to reputation and honor
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 5:30 am