How to Engage Dormant s Effectively
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:51 am
6% in Botswana). Conversely, countries in the American continent, whether in the North (5.1% in Canada and 2% in the United States) or the South (0.4% in Uruguay and 2% in Argentina) tend to have much lower audience shares. Five different media systems The study proposes a classification of the media systems of the 33 countries studied into five clusters with diametrically opposed models. The two most dissimilar clusters represent, on the one hand, the media systems described as " State-administered " and, on the other hand, those described as " Corporatist-Democratic ".
In the first of these two systems, the funding of public audiovisual media, reported united states of america phone number library per inhabitant of the countries concerned, is low but almost entirely provided by the State. The audience shares of public audiovisual media are high there but the public media are not independent of the public authorities . This is the case in Botswana and Tunisia. On the other hand, in the "Corporatist-Democratic" media system, the funding of public audiovisual media per inhabitant is high and mainly public. It is also often provided on a multi-year basis , a factor that secures and offers stability to the activity of public media.
In this system, public audiovisual media brings together very large audience shares. Finally, the national legal framework guarantees the full independence of the media. This system is that of the Scandinavian countries or even Germany as well as the United Kingdom . In addition to these two radically opposed models, the study presents three intermediate models. In particular, there is the " Liberal-Pluralist " media system in which public broadcasting benefits from less funding in volume but where this funding is mainly public. The legal guarantees of the independence of public media are a little less than in the "Corporatist-Democratic" system and the audience shares a little lower.
In the first of these two systems, the funding of public audiovisual media, reported united states of america phone number library per inhabitant of the countries concerned, is low but almost entirely provided by the State. The audience shares of public audiovisual media are high there but the public media are not independent of the public authorities . This is the case in Botswana and Tunisia. On the other hand, in the "Corporatist-Democratic" media system, the funding of public audiovisual media per inhabitant is high and mainly public. It is also often provided on a multi-year basis , a factor that secures and offers stability to the activity of public media.
In this system, public audiovisual media brings together very large audience shares. Finally, the national legal framework guarantees the full independence of the media. This system is that of the Scandinavian countries or even Germany as well as the United Kingdom . In addition to these two radically opposed models, the study presents three intermediate models. In particular, there is the " Liberal-Pluralist " media system in which public broadcasting benefits from less funding in volume but where this funding is mainly public. The legal guarantees of the independence of public media are a little less than in the "Corporatist-Democratic" system and the audience shares a little lower.