I've provided some descriptions

[zihadhasan019]

and explanations below each: Graph of Competition vs. Value of SEO Tactics This first graph is fairly basic. In low-level competition results - long tail or relatively unpopular queries and sectors - the relative value of basic on-page optimization is very high. That drops down as competition increases because many, many pages and sites will have proper keyword usage and targeting. The engines will instead choose rankings based on popularity and authority metrics, where links play a much larger role.


This isn't to say that it isn't still important to get the usa email database on-page stuff right; it's just unlikely to give you the boost you'll need to rank well in more competitive arenas. Graph of SEO ROI from Various Link Building Tactics I've obviously chosen only a few link building tactics to highlight here, but when constructing this graph, I found these to be particularly interesting. Manual link building tactics tend to trail off in value (in my experience) as a site becomes better known, more popular and earns a collection of thousands-millions of high quality links.





The incremental value added by another tiny directory or article submission site (or other small-site focused tactics like link exchanges or requests) becomes miniscule. Linkbait and Viral content is almost always high in value, particularly when you can craft content that helps to bring in links with the right anchor text pointing to the right kinds of places (like badges, widgets and embedded content). However, relatively speaking, the value is highest when the site is brand new and drops gradually with popularity.